Skip to main content

State v. Law

Citations

  • 110 P.3d 717

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • turning to “well-established” case law to interpret the Sentencing Reform Act of 1981, ch. 9.94A RCW
  • explaining that RCW 9.94A.585(4) contains three distinct three prongs
  • exceptional sentences cannot be \based on factors personal in nature to a particular defendant.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.