Arizona Supreme Court· 11/28/1972
State v. Fassler
Citations
- 503 P.2d 807
- 108 Ariz. 586
- 1972 Ariz. LEXIS 403
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting argument that Miranda warning given in traffic-violation context was insufficient to ensure the knowing and intelligent waiver of rights concerning the illegal substance violation actually being sought by the officers
- police removed burlap bags from garbage cans located in alleyway on the side of defendant's house
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cameron, Hays, Struckmeyer, Lockwood, Holohan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- California v. GreenwoodSupreme Court· 1988-05-16· cited 1,059×
- State v. BolandWashington Supreme Court· 1990-11-15· cited 249×
- State v. HempeleSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1990-07-17· cited 216×
- Cooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1985-04-26· cited 87×
- Commonwealth v. ChappeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1986-05-12· cited 79×
- State v. WaldenArizona Supreme Court· 1995-10-10· cited 56×
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa· 1975-04-16· cited 49×
- People v. HillmanSupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-07-20· cited 45×
- State v. TarasCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1972-12-19· cited 40×
- State v. LambArizona Supreme Court· 1977-06-13· cited 32×
- State v. PachecoArizona Supreme Court· 1978-11-22· cited 30×
- State v. WolohanCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1979-08-20· cited 25×
- People v. HuddlestonAppellate Court of Illinois· 1976-05-12· cited 25×
- State v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1999-03-17· cited 13×
- State v. HeberlyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-10-17· cited 13×
- State v. LippardCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-04-27· cited 13×
- State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1978-02-21· cited 12×
- State v. RandallCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-09-13· cited 12×
- State v. MimsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1973-06-26· cited 11×
- State v. RankenSuperior Court of Delaware· 2010-10-19· cited 10×
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 6,512×
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 4,391×
- United States v. RabinowitzSupreme Court· 1950-02-20· cited 2,080×
- Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 1,485×
- United States v. Van LeeuwenSupreme Court· 1970-04-27· cited 399×
- People v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-09-24· cited 301×
- People v. KrivdaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-07-12· cited 151×
- California v. KrivdaSupreme Court· 1972-12-11· cited 128×
- W. H. Wattenburg and William P. Owens v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1968-01-19· cited 127×
- State v. DeZelerSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1950-01-13· cited 123×
- People v. McKinnonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-09-13· cited 121×
- State v. McKnightSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1968-06-03· cited 113×
- Ramona Cipres and Juan Montes Deoca v. United StatesNinth Circuit· 1965-03-18· cited 95×
- Wyman Hulan Parr v. United StatesFifth Circuit· 1958-06-11· cited 91×
- United States v. Abraham Minker, Also Known as Abe MinkerThird Circuit· 1963-03-25· cited 84×
- United States v. Howard Jackson, Jr., United States of America v. Billy Joe Payne, United States of America v. Robert H. WillisNinth Circuit· 1971-09-13· cited 80×
Other cases named State v. Fassler
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.