Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2/5/1987

State v. Kunkel

Citations

404 N.W.2d 69
137 Wis. 2d 172
1987 Wisc. App. LEXIS 3468

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

applying the rescue doctrine to admit the defendant’s statements relating to the whereabouts of his missing daughter
defendant's statement that he could not afford counsel amounted to invocation of his right to counsel
defendant's statement that he could not afford counsel amounted to invocation of his right to counsel
police not prohibited from using privileged disclosures as source for discovery of other evidence; only when the communications themselves are sought to be admitted into evidence in a judicial proceeding does the rule of exclusion apply
police not prohibited from using privileged disclosures as source for discovery of other evidence; only when the communications themselves are sought to be admitted into evidence in a judicial proceeding does the rule of exclusion apply
permitting questions to suspect about a missing child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gartzke, P.J., Dykman, and Eich

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.