· 2/5/1987
State v. Kunkel
Citations
- 404 N.W.2d 69
- 137 Wis. 2d 172
- 1987 Wisc. App. LEXIS 3468
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the rescue doctrine to admit the defendant’s statements relating to the whereabouts of his missing daughter
- defendant's statement that he could not afford counsel amounted to invocation of his right to counsel
- defendant's statement that he could not afford counsel amounted to invocation of his right to counsel
- police not prohibited from using privileged disclosures as source for discovery of other evidence; only when the communications themselves are sought to be admitted into evidence in a judicial proceeding does the rule of exclusion apply
- police not prohibited from using privileged disclosures as source for discovery of other evidence; only when the communications themselves are sought to be admitted into evidence in a judicial proceeding does the rule of exclusion apply
- permitting questions to suspect about a missing child
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gartzke, P.J., Dykman, and Eich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.