Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/17/2018

State v. Kuck

Citations

2018 Ohio 3290

Syllabus

Trial court did not err in concluding that petitioner failed to demonstrate operative facts supporting his post-conviction relief claim that trial counsel was ineffective. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Thompson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-12-13· cited 10×
State v. Stoermer
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-09-20· cited 4×
State v. Covington
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-07· cited 4×
State v. Smith
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-01· cited 2×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Strickland v. Washington
Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
Blakemore v. Blakemore
Ohio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
State v. Bradley
Ohio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
State v. Calhoun
Ohio Supreme Court· 1999-09-01· cited 1,479×
State v. Cole
Ohio Supreme Court· 1982-12-29· cited 797×
State v. Jackson
Ohio Supreme Court· 1980-12-17· cited 791×
Bobby v. Van Hook
Supreme Court· 2009-11-09· cited 514×
State v. Herring (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-12-03· cited 31×
State v. Perkins
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-05-02· cited 26×
State v. Jordan
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-25· cited 11×
State v. Kuck
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-12-29· cited 10×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.