Skip to main content

State v. Covington

Citations

  • 2020 Ohio 390

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in overruling appellant's petition for post-conviction relief on grounds of untimeliness and res judicata, because the untimeliness of appellant's petition and res judicata bar a challenge to a voidable sentence. Even though the trial court imposed a non-mandatory prison sentence for appellant's offense of engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity when a mandatory prison sentence was required by law, that portion of appellant's sentence was voidable, not void. Judgment affirmed. (Froelich, J., concurring in judgment.)

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.