Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Supreme Court· 11/9/2009

Bobby v. Van Hook

Citations

  • 558 U.S. 4
  • 130 S. Ct. 13
  • 175 L. Ed. 2d 255
  • 2009 U.S. LEXIS 7976

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that counsel's failure to interview potential witnesses not ineffective where potential testimony would not have added significant value to overall defense
  • holding that counsel’s performance is not deficient in declining “to spend valuable time pursuing what appeared to be an unfruitful line of investigation” (quoting Bunch v. 949 F.2d 1354, 1364 (4th Cir. 1991))
  • concluding that counsel’s failure to interview extended relatives in order to better help “narrate the true story of [the defendant’s] childhood experiences” was not prejudicial because the witnesses would have adduced only “minor additional details”
  • explaining that Strickland does not require attorneys to “dig deeper” when substantial mitigation evidence is already in hand following a reasonably thorough investigation
  • holding performance not deficient because counsel gathered a substantial amount of information and then made a reasonable decision not to pursue additional sources
  • concluding that, even if counsel was deficient for failing to investigate certain mitigation witnesses, the deficiency was not prejudicial because any arguably “new” evidence the witnesses would have offered was minor additional details that contributed nothing of value.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alito

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

284 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.