Skip to main content

State v. Thompson

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 5140

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion by overruling appellant's multiple petitions for post-conviction relief. The claims raised in appellant's petitions were either not supported by credible affidavits or any evidentiary documents that established substantive grounds for relief or they were otherwise barred by the doctrine of res judicata. The trial court also did not abuse its discretion by overruling appellant's motion for new trial, as the motion was untimely and appellant failed to establish that he was unavoidably prevented from timely filing the motion. Judgment affirmed.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • copy at Decision, State Court Record, ECF No. 69, PageID 2869.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.