Supreme Court of South Carolina· 6/22/1977
State v. Kirby
Citations
- 236 S.E.2d 33
- 269 S.C. 25
- 1977 S.C. LEXIS 256
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a mistrial was manifestly necessary where the solicitor died during trial
- power of court to declare mistrial ought to be used with greatest caution under urgent circumstances, and for very plain and obvious causes
- the trial judge is best situated to decide if there are compelling reasons for declaring a mistrial
- “The power of a court to declare a mistrial ought to be used with the greatest caution under urgent circumstances, and for very plain and obvious causes.”
- manifest necessity established when prosecutor died during trial and assistant prosecutor was unable to take over because he was \totally unprepared to prosecute the remainder of the case\ and \in no emotional condition to continue the case\
- manifest necessity established when prosecutor died during trial and assistant prosecutor was unable to take over because he was “totally unprepared to prosecute the remainder of the case” and “in no emotional condition to continue the case”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ness, Lewis, Rhodes, Gregory, Littlejohn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-05-05· cited 161×
- State v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-09-20· cited 92×
- State v. StanleySupreme Court of South Carolina· 2005-06-27· cited 61×
- State v. HiottSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-03-03· cited 55×
- State v. GilbertSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1981-09-14· cited 54×
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-01-06· cited 47×
- State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2002-11-25· cited 34×
- State v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2006-12-21· cited 33×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-11-25· cited 31×
- State v. RowlandsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2000-12-11· cited 23×
- Baum v. RushtonFourth Circuit· 2009-07-16· cited 21×
- State v. DasherSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1982-12-08· cited 20×
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-21· cited 16×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-03-02· cited 15×
- State v. MathisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2004-06-01· cited 13×
- State v. NortonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1985-07-02· cited 11×
- Carman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 2018-06-18· cited 11×
- State v. BaumCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-06-16· cited 7×
- Horry County v. ParbelCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2008-05-12· cited 3×
- State v. GambleSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1980-12-08· cited 3×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Benton v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 4,063×
- United States v. JornSupreme Court· 1971-01-25· cited 2,215×
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court· 1824-03-23· cited 1,814×
- Wade v. HunterSupreme Court· 1949-04-25· cited 1,511×
- Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court· 1973-02-27· cited 1,368×
- Gori v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 679×
- State v. StephensonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1899-02-20· cited 17×
- State v. RavencraftSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1952-07-28· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.