Skip to main content

Carman v. State

Citations

  • 815 S.E.2d 860

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that we generally treat this State’s statutory double jeopardy claims “in a manner consistent with case law from the United States Supreme Court regarding the Fifth Amendment”
  • determining that the case was “properly before [appellate court] as a direct appeal, because the appeal of a denied plea of double jeopardy is subject to the collateral order doctrine”
  • mistrial cannot be condoned if the trial court “acts for reasons completely unrelated to the trial problem which purports to be the basis for the mistrial ruling” or otherwise “acts irrationally or irresponsibly”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.