Supreme Court of South Carolina· 7/2/1985
State v. Norton
Citations
- 332 S.E.2d 531
- 286 S.C. 95
- 1985 S.C. LEXIS 454
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that reindictment for committing a lewd act upon a child after acquittal for sexual battery on a minor did not place defendant in double jeopardy because lewdness did not require sexual battery and lewdness requires intent of appealing to sexual desires of himself or child
- age is element of first degree CSC with a minor
- committing a lewd act upon a minor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harwell, Littlejohn, Ness, Gregory, Chandler
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. KornahrensSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1986-10-13· cited 73×
- State v. WileySupreme Court of Vermont· 2007-02-02· cited 25×
- State v. EaslerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1996-05-13· cited 23×
- State v. CarterSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-02-16· cited 11×
- Cohen v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2003-06-02· cited 6×
- Campbell v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2000-08-14· cited 4×
- State v. BrockCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 1999-03-29· cited 3×
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court· 1977-06-16· cited 3,552×
- State v. KirbySupreme Court of South Carolina· 1977-06-22· cited 34×
- State v. HallSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-12-21· cited 19×
- State v. DobsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-11-29· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.