Washington Supreme Court· 9/8/2005
State v. Kinneman
Citations
- 155 Wash. 2d 272
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the restitution statute provides a scheme that is more like indeterminate sentencing not subject to Sixth Amendment jury determinations
- “Restitution is allowed only for losses that are causally connected to a crime . . . .”
- evidence supporting restitution sufficient if it affords a reasonable basis for estimating loss and does not subject the trier of fact to mere speculation or conjecture
- “RCW 9.94A.753 allows 6 No. 83052-0-I/7 the judge considerable discretion in determining restitution.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Madsen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State Of Washington, V. James Laron EllisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2023-06-13· cited 235×
- State v. CastroCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-10-30· cited 192×
- State v. TobinWashington Supreme Court· 2007-09-13· cited 119×
- Dix v. ICT Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 2007-07-12· cited 110×
- State v. GriffithWashington Supreme Court· 2008-11-06· cited 98×
- State v. MathersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-05-10· cited 88×
- State v. DeskinsWashington Supreme Court· 2014-03-27· cited 68×
- State v. DevinWashington Supreme Court· 2006-08-24· cited 40×
- J.H. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2011-06-03· cited 32×
- State v. ArnettSupreme Court of Kansas· 2021-10-15· cited 31×
- T.C. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2005-12-30· cited 31×
- State v. StachowskiCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-11-20· cited 23×
- State v. B.O.J.Washington Supreme Court· 2019-10-03· cited 23×
- People v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals· 2007-08-23· cited 21×
- Hickok-Knight v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2012-06-07· cited 20×
- State v. CawyerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2014-07-29· cited 19×
- State v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2014-10-24· cited 16×
- State Of Washington v. Samuel MatamuaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2023-11-28· cited 14×
- State v. TobinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-03-21· cited 13×
- State v. OrozcoCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-03-17· cited 13×
Cites
33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 28,372×
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court· 2004-10-01· cited 23,210×
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 2004-06-24· cited 13,994×
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 2002-06-24· cited 4,683×
- State v. AmmonsWashington Supreme Court· 2005-06-08· cited 422×
- Blanton v. City of North Las VegasSupreme Court· 1989-03-06· cited 382×
- State v. HughesWashington Supreme Court· 2005-04-14· cited 352×
- State v. DavisonWashington Supreme Court· 1991-05-16· cited 161×
- State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court· 1996-07-18· cited 159×
- United States v. NachtigalSupreme Court· 1993-02-22· cited 137×
- State v. MailWashington Supreme Court· 1993-06-17· cited 129×
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court· 2003-04-10· cited 107×
- State v. EnstoneWashington Supreme Court· 1999-04-15· cited 104×
- State v. ShultzWashington Supreme Court· 1999-07-29· cited 79×
- City of Kennewick v. DayWashington Supreme Court· 2000-10-12· cited 55×
- State v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-08-03· cited 54×
- State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-04-17· cited 53×
- State v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-08-01· cited 50×
- State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-08-02· cited 49×
- State v. BarrWashington Supreme Court· 1983-02-24· cited 44×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.