Court of Appeals of Washington· 10/30/2007

State v. Castro

Citations

170 P.3d 78

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a defendant effectively 8 abandons a postconviction claim raised in the district court but not specifically reassert ed on appeal
holding that PPG testing is a valid sentencing condition and “is regarded as a ‘treatment device’ for diagnosing and treating sex offenders”
holding that a defendant effectively 8 abandons a postconviction claim raised in the district court but not specifically reassert ed on appeal
holding that PPG testing is a valid sentencing condition and “is regarded as a ‘treatment device’ for diagnosing and treating sex offenders” (citing Riles, 135 Wn.2d at 345)
involving a second degree child molestation conviction
involving a second degree child molestation conviction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State v. Castro

87 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.