United States v. Buddy Joe Barnard

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \the Government's interest in the efficient administration of justice\ outweighed appellants' Sixth Amendment right to be represented at trial by their counsel of choice
• holding that trial court properly excluded psychiatric and psychological testimony as to credibility of codefendant
• writing that the determination of the weight and credibility of witness testimony “has long been held” to belong to the jury
• stating the rule that venue is proper in any federal district in which continuing conduct has occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).