State v. Kim

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting \a defendant must show there are material facts in dispute to be entitled to an evidentiary hearing\ under Rule 3:5-7(c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Marquez
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2010-07-12· cited 78×
• State v. Rodriguez-Alejo
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2011-03-25

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Mathews v. Eldridge
  Supreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
• Wene v. Meyner
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1953-07-09· cited 79×
• State v. Widmaier
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-03-03· cited 71×
• State v. Cummings
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2005-06-23· cited 63×
• Jamgochian v. New Jersey State Parole Board
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2008-08-06· cited 58×
• State v. Bernhardt
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-01-10· cited 27×
• State v. Green
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2001-07-09· cited 24×
• State v. Hewins
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1979-02-09· cited 14×
• State v. Kadonsky
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1996-02-29· cited 13×
• State v. Hewins
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1981-03-19· cited 11×
• State v. Howard
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2006-03-08· cited 6×
• State v. Nunez
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1976-01-15· cited 5×
• State v. Marquez
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2009-07-01· cited 4×