Oregon Supreme Court· 6/22/2017
State v. Keller
Citations
- 361 Or. 566
- 396 P.3d 917
- 2017 Ore. LEXIS 418
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding unauthorized stop does not give rise to constitutional violation under search and seizure provisions of Oregon Constitution under all the facts and circumstances of the case
- holding unauthorized stop does not give rise to constitutional violation under search and seizure provisions of Oregon Constitution under all the facts and circumstances of the case
- finding that an unauthorized stop by a Washington police officer that would have been legal if performed by an Oregon police officer did not violate the Oregon Constitution and therefore the suppression of evidence in a driving-while-intoxicated case was not required
- finding that an unauthorized stop by a Washington police officer that would have been legal if performed by an Oregon police officer did not violate the Oregon Constitution and therefore the suppression of evidence in a driving-while-intoxicated case was not required
- Article I, section 9, “imposes limits on searches and seizures in order to prevent arbitrary and oppressive interference by law enforcement officials with the privacy and personal security of individu- als” (internal quotation and brackets omitted)
- Article I, section 9, “imposes limits on searches and seizures in order to prevent arbitrary and oppressive interference by law enforcement officials with the privacy and personal security of individu- als” (internal quotation and brackets omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Balmer, Kistler, Walters, Landau, Brewer, Nakamoto, Flynn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court· 1961-10-09· cited 9,088×
- Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1963-06-10· cited 3,146×
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 2,501×
- United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 2,153×
- Virginia v. MooreSupreme Court· 2008-04-23· cited 793×
- State v. RodgersOregon Supreme Court· 2010-02-11· cited 194×
- State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court· 1984-09-25· cited 164×
- State v. RodriguezOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-01· cited 138×
- State v. BridewellOregon Supreme Court· 1988-07-26· cited 131×
- State v. TourtillotOregon Supreme Court· 1980-10-21· cited 121×
- Nelson v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court· 1987-09-15· cited 119×
- State v. TourtillottOregon Supreme Court· 1980-10-21· cited 114×
- State v. UngerOregon Supreme Court· 2014-08-28· cited 113×
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court· 1992-06-05· cited 103×
- State v. KrognessOregon Supreme Court· 1963-12-31· cited 75×
- State v. HoldorfOregon Supreme Court· 2014-08-07· cited 75×
- State v. CunyNebraska Supreme Court· 1999-06-25· cited 47×
- People v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Colorado· 1983-07-18· cited 45×
- State v. BonillaOregon Supreme Court· 2015-12-31· cited 39×
- State v. BarkerWashington Supreme Court· 2001-06-21· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.