Skip to main content

State v. Barker

Citations

  • 25 P.3d 423

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a legislative attempt to codify and potentially expand common law principles by RCW 10.31.100
  • recognizing a legislative attempt to codify and potentially expand common law principles by RCW 10.31.100
  • finding that under RCW 10.93-.020(5), a specially commissioned Washington peace officer need only be a “ ‘full-time, fully compensated peace officer! ] duly commissioned by the state! ] of Oregon’ ” (alterations in original)
  • suppressing evidence obtained unlawfully in fresh pursuit across state borders yet leaving undecided whether the exclusionary rule applies to Washington's fresh pursuit statute
  • suppressing evidence obtained unlawfully in fresh pursuit across state borders yet leaving undecided whether the exclusionary rule applies to Washington's fresh pursuit statute
  • noting common-law exception for fresh pursuit of a person who committed a felony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Madsen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.