Washington Supreme Court· 6/21/2001
State v. Barker
Citations
- 25 P.3d 423
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing a legislative attempt to codify and potentially expand common law principles by RCW 10.31.100
- recognizing a legislative attempt to codify and potentially expand common law principles by RCW 10.31.100
- finding that under RCW 10.93-.020(5), a specially commissioned Washington peace officer need only be a “ ‘full-time, fully compensated peace officer! ] duly commissioned by the state! ] of Oregon’ ” (alterations in original)
- suppressing evidence obtained unlawfully in fresh pursuit across state borders yet leaving undecided whether the exclusionary rule applies to Washington's fresh pursuit statute
- suppressing evidence obtained unlawfully in fresh pursuit across state borders yet leaving undecided whether the exclusionary rule applies to Washington's fresh pursuit statute
- noting common-law exception for fresh pursuit of a person who committed a felony
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Madsen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
18 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court· 2003-01-30· cited 427×
- State v. WintersteinWashington Supreme Court· 2009-12-03· cited 150×
- People v. GalanIllinois Supreme Court· 2008-07-24· cited 18×
- Pruczinski v. AshbyWashington Supreme Court· 2016-05-05· cited 16×
- State v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-09-11· cited 12×
- State v. EriksenWashington Supreme Court· 2011-09-01· cited 10×
- State v. KellerOregon Supreme Court· 2017-06-22· cited 6×
- City of Bremerton v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-04-27· cited 5×
- State v. EriksenWashington Supreme Court· 2009-09-17· cited 4×
- Pruczinski v. AshbyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-02-12· cited 4×
- City of Bremerton v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-06-15· cited 3×
- Alex Wayne Westra v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa· 2019-06-14· cited 3×
- State v. VotavaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-12-20· cited 2×
- State v. KellerMultnomah County Circuit Court, Oregon· 2016-06-15· cited 2×
- State v. EriksenWashington Supreme Court· 2010-10-14· cited 1×
- In re the License Suspension of RichieCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-06-07· cited 1×
- State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2006-10-24
- Kay L. Pruczinski et vir v. Allen Ashby et uxCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-02-12
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. LadsonWashington Supreme Court· 1999-07-01· cited 415×
- State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court· 1982-02-18· cited 340×
- State v. BolandWashington Supreme Court· 1990-11-15· cited 249×
- State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court· 2001-02-02· cited 164×
- State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court· 1999-11-04· cited 157×
- State v. BobicWashington Supreme Court· 2000-04-06· cited 154×
- Honcoop v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1988-07-15· cited 140×
- Estate of Jordan v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1993-01-21· cited 96×
- State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court· 1967-03-02· cited 39×
- State v. BarkerWashington Supreme Court· 2001-06-21· cited 26×
- Irwin v. Department of Motor VehiclesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1974-01-03· cited 18×
- State v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-12-17· cited 6×
- State v. RasmussenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-08-09· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.