Skip to main content

State v. Keeton

Citations

  • 589 N.W.2d 85
  • 1998 Minn. LEXIS 910
  • 1998 WL 907967

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a reviewing court need not determine whether an error standing alone would warrant a new trial if the “errors, taken cumulatively, deprived the appellant of his right to a fair trial”
  • declining to determine whether each error, standing alone, would warrant a new trial because the “errors, taken cumulatively, deprived the appellant of his right to a fair trial”
  • declining to determine whether an error standing alone would warrant a new trial because the “errors, taken cumulatively, deprived the appellant of his right to a fair trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blatz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.