Supreme Court of Iowa· 2/16/2000
State v. Hallum
Citations
- 606 N.W.2d 351
- 2000 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 38
- 2000 WL 177178
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “the nature of the defendant’s conduct is not as important as the effect of that conduct on the witnesses’s willingness to testify at trial”
- “it is the fact that a defendant’s conduct interferes with the interest in having witnesses testify at a public trial that makes the defendant’s conduct wrongful”
- “Misconduct sufficient to give rise to a forfeiture is not limited to the use of threats, force[,] or intimidation…. [I]t has also been held to include persuasion and control by a defendant ….”
- discussing the difference between the two terms
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ternus, Snell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-06-21· cited 238×
- State v. NewellSupreme Court of Iowa· 2006-02-10· cited 231×
- Smith v. TexasSupreme Court· 2007-04-25· cited 90×
- Commonwealth v. EdwardsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2005-07-01· cited 88×
- United States v. JohnsonEighth Circuit· 2007-07-30· cited 75×
- State v. RomeroNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-03-15· cited 56×
- People v. GilesCalifornia Supreme Court· 2007-03-05· cited 56×
- State v. BentleySupreme Court of Iowa· 2007-09-28· cited 43×
- State v. ByrdSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2009-04-02· cited 42×
- Vasquez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 2007-11-13· cited 35×
- State v. TylerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-04-19· cited 33×
- Hook v. LippoltSupreme Court of Iowa· 2008-08-29· cited 30×
- People v. MelchorAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-11-14· cited 30×
- State v. MaestasNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2018-01-08· cited 19×
- Huisman v. MiedemaSupreme Court of Iowa· 2002-05-08· cited 17×
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-06-19· cited 12×
- State v. FranklinCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-07-11· cited 4×
- State v. ByrdNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2007-05-22· cited 3×
- Gonzalez, RayCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-06-21
- United States v. Angela Jane JohnsonEighth Circuit· 2007-07-30
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1879-01-18· cited 1,827×
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1999-06-14· cited 1,183×
- United States v. Michael G. Thevis, Alton Bart Hood, Global Industries, Inc., Anna Jeanette EvansFifth Circuit· 1982-01-11· cited 425×
- United States v. Donald Laverne Carlson, United States of America v. Gary Clarend HofstadEighth Circuit· 1977-01-18· cited 296×
- United States v. Ronald J. GoldbergThird Circuit· 1995-10-16· cited 259×
- United States v. HoulihanFirst Circuit· 1996-08-22· cited 222×
- People v. GeraciNew York Court of Appeals· 1995-03-28· cited 220×
- United States v. Antone R. White, A/K/A ToneD.C. Circuit· 1997-06-27· cited 158×
- Robert L. Steele v. Terry D. Taylor, Supt., Owen J. Kilbane v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt., Martin A. Kilbane v. Ronald C. Marshall, Supt.Sixth Circuit· 1982-07-28· cited 121×
- United States v. Tony E. EmeryEighth Circuit· 1999-07-30· cited 113×
- United States v. Phillip R. BalanoTenth Circuit· 1980-05-20· cited 107×
- State v. LigginsSupreme Court of Iowa· 1994-11-23· cited 107×
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of Iowa· 1997-01-22· cited 71×
- State v. HallumSupreme Court of Iowa· 1998-10-21· cited 68×
- Devonshire v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1997-03-27· cited 38×
- State v. SeagerSupreme Court of Iowa· 1997-10-22· cited 34×
- State v. FoxSupreme Court of Iowa· 1992-10-21· cited 32×
- State v. KeetonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1998-12-31· cited 32×
- State v. YawSupreme Court of Iowa· 1987-01-14· cited 28×
- United States v. Levi Strauss & Co.Supreme Court· 1999-06-14· cited 28×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.