Supreme Court of Minnesota· 3/1/2001

State v. King

Citations

622 N.W.2d 800
2001 Minn. LEXIS 134
2001 WL 199846

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

placing on the state the burden of proving that hearsay statement does not violate defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights
placing on the state the burden of proving that hearsay statement does not violate defendant's Sixth Amendment rights
reviewing evidence about the state’s failed efforts to produce a witness at trial to determine whether that witness was unavailable in the context of the Confrontation Clause
“inquiry is not ‘whether a jury would have convicted the defendant, rather whether the error reasonably could have [had an impact on] ... the jury’s decision’ ”
“Statements that fall within a ‘firmly-rooted’ hearsay exception are assumed to be reliable and are therefore admissible.” (citation omitted)
state bears the burden of establishing witness unavailability and consequent necessity of hearsay evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Paul H. Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.