Skip to main content

State v. Kamal

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 2261

Syllabus

Gross sexual imposition consecutive sentences findings R.C. 2953.08 R.C. 2929.14 nunc pro tunc journal entry. The trial court made the required consecutive sentence findings at the sentencing hearing, and the trial court's consecutive sentence findings are clearly and convincingly supported by the record. The trial court did not incorporate all of the consecutive sentence findings made at the sentencing hearing into the court's sentencing journal entry. The matter is remanded for the limited purpose of issuing a nunc pro tunc sentencing journal entry incorporating all of the consecutive sentence findings the trial court made at the sentencing hearing.

Judges: Celebrezze

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.