State v. Wilkins

Citations

• 2021 Ohio 311

Syllabus

Resentencing hearing R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) consecutive sentence findings incorporation into sentencing journal entry identical language nunc pro tunc order. Although the trial court must incorporate the consecutive sentence findings it made at the sentencing hearing into its sentencing journal entry, it is not required, when doing so, to use the identical language it used when making those findings at the sentencing hearing. Trial court made all of the requisite findings to support the imposition of consecutive sentences under R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) at the resentencing hearing but did not incorporate all of its consecutive sentence findings into its sentencing journal entry. Consecutive sentences affirmed but case remanded for the trial court to issue a nunc pro tunc order incorporating all of the consecutive sentence findings it made at the resentencing hearing into its sentencing journal entry.