Ohio Court of Appeals· 12/8/2022
State v. Smith
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 4396
Syllabus
Sentence consecutive R.C. 2929.14 drug possession. Judgment affirmed. The trial court complied with the requirements of R.C. 2929.14(C)(4) and made the required proportionality findings. Therefore, we cannot conclude that the record \clearly and convincingly\ does not support these findings. Defendant's consecutive 24-month sentence is proper.
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. PawlakOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-22· cited 75×
- State v. MorrisOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-11-03· cited 38×
- State v. BalbiOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-01· cited 18×
- State v. McGowanOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-26· cited 11×
- State v. AngelOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-01-13· cited 11×
- State v. HicksOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-14· cited 9×
- State v. DelmonicoOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-18· cited 6×
- State v. BennettOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-06-25· cited 5×
- State v. KamalOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-01· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.