Arizona Supreme Court· 3/28/1973

State v. Kaiser

Citations

508 P.2d 74
109 Ariz. 244
1973 Ariz. LEXIS 317

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“As a general rule evidence cannot be reviewed on appeal in the absence of an offer of proof showing that the excluded evidence would be admissible and relevant.”
\As a general rule evidence cannot be reviewed on appeal in the absence of an offer of proof showing that the excluded evidence would be admissible and relevant.\
\[t]he character of the defendant ... is certainly relevant and material to his defense against the charge of assault with a deadly weapon\
“[t]he character of the defendant... is certainly relevant and material to his defense against the charge of assault with a deadly weapon”
“As a general rule evidence cannot be reviewed on appeal in the absence of an offer of proof.”
“As a general rule evidence cannot be reviewed on appeal in the absence of an offer of proof showing that the excluded evidence would be admissible and relevant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockwood, Hays, Cameron, Struckmeyer, Holohan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.