State of Arizona v. Robert Hernandez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding trial court did not abuse its discretion when it considered the LaGrand factors but \did not explicitly refer to the aforementioned factors\
• affirming a judgment where the party did not make an offer of proof to show how the evidence conflicted with the witness’s testimony
• \[T]he absence of an offer of proof renders us unable to evaluate the trial court's ruling.\
• jury could have found defendant acted as accomplice, intending to aid codefendant in committing capital murder, based on planned home invasion, no attempt to conceal his identity from victims
• “While bound, [the victim] would have been uncertain as to her fate, and thus suffered the requisite mental anguish necessary for the ‘especially cruel’ finding required by § 13-751(F)(6).” (internal citation omitted)
• “A prior inconsistent statement by a witness subject to cross-examination is not hearsay.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).