Skip to main content
· 3/22/1988

Marriage of Molloy v. Molloy

Citations

  • 761 P.2d 138
  • 158 Ariz. 64
  • 4 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 15
  • 1988 Ariz. App. LEXIS 53

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an offer of proof may not be necessary “when the court has ruled broadly that no evidence is admissible in support of the theory or fact sought to be established[.]” (citation modified)
  • explaining that offers of proof in a civil matter “serve the dual function of enabling the trial court to appreciate the context and consequences of an evidentiary ruling and enabling the appellate court to determine whether [the exclusion of the evidence] was harmful”
  • goodwill of incorporated law firm is a marital asset subject to distribution
  • offer of proof “serves the dual function of enabling the trial court to appreciate the context and consequences of an evidentiary ruling and enabling the appellate court to determine whether any error was harmful”
  • husband's interest in law firm's goodwill is distributable asset

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fidel, Jacobson, Brooks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.