State v. Kiser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that when fact of prior conviction is offered for impeachment, a reversal means “[i]t is as if the prior felony conviction had never occurred”
• noting that when fact of prior conviction is offered for impeachment, a reversal means \[i]t is as if the prior felony conviction had never occurred\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gomez
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2006-02-08· cited 67×
• Hale v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1976-07-23· cited 28×
• State v. Henderson
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-05-17· cited 23×
• Wickham v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1989-02-10· cited 16×
• State v. Ferreira
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1986-07-09· cited 8×
• State v. Miller
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1981-07-17· cited 5×
• State v. Kiser
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-03-05· cited 5×
• People v. Woollums
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-05-21· cited 5×
• James v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1981-10-27· cited 4×
• State v. Lewis
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-06-20· cited 2×
• State v. Green
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-08-11· cited 1×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• John William Smith v. Dominick Spina, Individually and as Director of the Police Department of the City of Newark, N. J.
  Third Circuit· 1973-04-24· cited 63×
• State v. Sorrell
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1959-01-21· cited 42×
• State v. Kaiser
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1973-03-28· cited 26×
• State v. Johnson
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1965-10-08· cited 20×
• United States v. Jerry Earl Allen
  Ninth Circuit· 1972-04-12· cited 19×
• State v. Reeden
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1970-12-02· cited 8×