Skip to main content
· 5/23/2023

State v. Sevilla

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 1726

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's motion for leave to file a delayed motion for new trial without holding a hearing. Appellant failed to provide clear and convincing proof that he was unavoidably prevented from discovering the evidence on which he seeks to base a motion for a new trial. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Beatty Blunt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.