Skip to main content

Rodriguez v. State

Citations

  • 232 S.W.3d 55
  • 2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 624
  • 2007 WL 1343066

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the only issue was whether the facts actually contained in the affidavit were sufficient to establish a fair probability that evidence of a crime would be found
  • holding that there was probable cause to issue a search warrant based on reasonable inferences made by magistrate’s “commonsensical and realistic interpretation” of affidavit
  • holding that there was probable cause to issue a search warrant based on reasonable inferences made by magistrate = s A commonsensical and realistic interpretation @ of affidavit
  • holding that the only issue was whether the facts actually contained in the affidavit were sufficient to establish a fair probability that evidence of a crime would be found
  • holding that the only issue was whether the facts actually contained in the affidavit were sufficient to establish a fair probability that evidence of a crime would be found
  • holding that the Fourth Amendment requires that a magistrate find probable cause to believe that a particular item will be found at a particular location before it may issue a search warrant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Keller, Price, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Meyers, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

336 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.