Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 7/11/2012

State v. Anthony Granville

Citations

  • 373 S.W.3d 218
  • 2012 WL 2847903
  • 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 5544

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • fact that defendant’s cell phone was in jail property room did nothing to “nullify” his “reasonable expectation of privacy in the phone searched.”
  • fact that defendant’s cell phone was in jail property room did nothing to \nullify” his \reasonable expectation of privacy in the phone searched.”
  • fact that defendant's cell phone was in jail property room did nothing to \nullify\ his \reasonable expectation of privacy in the phone searched.\
  • fact that defendant’s cell phone was in jail property room did nothing to -“nullif}f’ his “reas`onable expectation of privacy in the phone searched.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Quinn, Hancock, Pirtle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Anthony Granville

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.