Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 3/3/2004
Stewart v. State
Citations
- 129 S.W.3d 93
- 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 380
- 2004 WL 385585
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that 0.154 and 0.160 alcohol concentration results of breath tests taken eighty minutes after the defendant had been driving had considerable probative value
- holding that 0.154 and 0.160 alcohol concentration results of breath tests taken eighty minutes after defendant was operating vehicle had considerable probative value
- holding that intoxilyzer test results are probative evidence of intoxication under either theory
- explaining that “[e]vidence need not by itself prove or disprove a particular fact to be relevant; it is sufficient if the evidence provides a small nudge toward proving or disproving some fact of consequence”
- reversing the court of appeals holding that test result eighty minutes after driving was inadmissible without retrograde analysis
- reversing the lower court’s holding that breath tests are inadmissible without reliable retrograde extrapolation evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Keasler, Keller, Meyers, Womack, Johnson, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Price
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
153 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MechlerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2005-01-12· cited 667×
- Gonzalez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2018-04-11· cited 361×
- Kirsch v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-02-10· cited 235×
- State of Texas v. Esparza, CarlosCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2013-10-30· cited 110×
- State v. RobinsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-03-16· cited 108×
- State v. JordanCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-06-29· cited 103×
- Ramjattansingh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2018-06-06· cited 89×
- Esaw Lampkin v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2015-08-11· cited 60×
- Edwards v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2005-06-30· cited 56×
- Ex Parte SmithCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-04-28· cited 56×
- Blumenstetter v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2004-04-06· cited 55×
- Kevin DWayne Kennemur v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2008-05-08· cited 53×
- Johnson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2008-05-28· cited 48×
- Bjorgaard v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2007-05-02· cited 33×
- State v. CowsertCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-11-15· cited 31×
- Martinez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2004-11-24· cited 28×
- Adams v. StateTex. App. Ct., 9th Dist. (Beaumont)· 2005-01-26· cited 25×
- Kirsch v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2008-12-04· cited 24×
- Dunn v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2005-10-06· cited 24×
- Gonzales v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2010-10-27· cited 23×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-04-15· cited 1,896×
- Bagheri v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-11-05· cited 324×
- Manning v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2003-09-10· cited 315×
- Commonwealth v. JarmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-22· cited 93×
- Commonwealth v. ModaffareSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-22· cited 72×
- Commonwealth v. LoeperSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-06-23· cited 46×
- Bagheri v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2002-06-28· cited 41×
- Stewart v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2003-07-02· cited 33×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.