Skip to main content

Stewart v. State

Citations

  • 129 S.W.3d 93
  • 2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 380
  • 2004 WL 385585

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that 0.154 and 0.160 alcohol concentration results of breath tests taken eighty minutes after the defendant had been driving had considerable probative value
  • holding that 0.154 and 0.160 alcohol concentration results of breath tests taken eighty minutes after defendant was operating vehicle had considerable probative value
  • holding that intoxilyzer test results are probative evidence of intoxication under either theory
  • explaining that “[e]vidence need not by itself prove or disprove a particular fact to be relevant; it is sufficient if the evidence provides a small nudge toward proving or disproving some fact of consequence”
  • reversing the court of appeals holding that test result eighty minutes after driving was inadmissible without retrograde analysis
  • reversing the lower court’s holding that breath tests are inadmissible without reliable retrograde extrapolation evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keasler, Keller, Meyers, Womack, Johnson, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

153 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.