Skip to main content

State v. Jordan

Citations

  • 116 S.W.3d 8
  • 2003 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 301
  • 2003 WL 1737912

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that jurors are presumed to follow the instructions given them absent evidence to the contrary
  • observing that jurors are presumed to follow the instructions given them absent evidence to the contrary
  • considering prior convictions before the sentencing hearing for acts committed after the charged offence for enhancement purposes
  • defining previous criminal convictions for enhancement purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge Jerry L. Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.