Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 8/19/1999

State v. Jones

Citations

15 S.W.3d 880
1999 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 850

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that Rule 613 permitted questioning of witnesses about their own prior inconsistent statements for impeachment purposes
observing that “[i]mpeachment cannot be a ‘mere ruse’ to present to the jury prejudicial or improper testimony”
defendant waived issue of improper admission of prior bad act because he made no objection and did not request a jury-out hearing
defendant waived issue of improper admission of prior bad act because he made no objection and did not request a jury-out hearing
defendant’s involvement in a stolen car parts ring and the fact that he was on parole
“Under Rule 404(b), the defendant has the burden of requesting a jury out hearing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gary R. Wade

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

140 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.