Skip to main content

State v. McCary

Citations

  • 922 S.W.2d 511
  • 1996 Tenn. LEXIS 311

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that testimony by an individual about the defendant’s unindicted criminal behavior with him was inadmissible to prove the defendant’s intent to commit the offenses against the victims in that case pursuant to Rule 404(b
  • holding that McCary’s personal diary entries expressing romantic feelings for several young men “constituted highly prejudicial ‘propensity’ evidence” and should not have been admitted when they did not reference any of the victims or witnesses at trial
  • holding that McCary’s personal diary entries expressing romantic feelings for several young men “constituted highly prejudicial ‘propensity’ evidence” and should not have been admitted when they did not reference any of the victims or witnesses at trial
  • stating that common scheme or plan evidence “is often misunderstood” and is most often used “when the identity of the defendant is in issue” (emphasis omitted)
  • prior bad acts of defendant not admissible to rebut claim of accident where defendant has not asserted such as a defense
  • evidence of a criminal defendant's character may become admissible when it logically tends to prove material issues which have been divided into three categories: (1) the use of \motive and common scheme or plan\ to establish identity, (2

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Birch, Reid, White, Drowota

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

123 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.