Skip to main content
· 9/1/2017

State of Tennessee v. Deewaine Mikel Bumpas

Syllabus

In October 2013, the Davidson County Grand Jury indicted the Defendant-Appellant, Deewaine Mikel Bumpas, in count one for aggravated robbery occurring on June 19, 2013 in count two for attempted aggravated robbery occurring on June 26, 2013 and in count three for aggravated robbery occurring on July 3, 2013. The trial court, at the State's request, severed counts one and two, and the parties proceeded to trial on count three. A jury subsequently convicted Bumpas, as charged, of the July 3, 2013 aggravated robbery, and the trial court imposed a sentence of twelve years at 85% release eligibility. See T.C.A. §§ 39-13-402, 40-35-501(k)(1). On appeal, Bumpas contends: (1) the trial court erred in denying his motion to exclude the photographic lineup and accompanying testimony (2) the trial court erred in denying his motion to exclude the surveillance video and accompanying testimony (3) the trial court abused its discretion in sustaining the State's objection to questions regarding Sergeant Williams' personnel record (4) the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial (5) the evidence is insufficient to sustain his conviction (6) the trial court imposed an excessive sentence and (7) the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for new trial. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Judges: Judge Camille R. McMullen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.