Skip to main content
· 4/27/2011

Burke v. AnMed Health

Citations

  • 710 S.E.2d 84
  • 393 S.C. 48
  • 2011 S.C. App. LEXIS 108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a contemporaneous objection is typically required to preserve issues for appellate review
  • \Whether the verdict is so excessive as to require a new trial is within the discretion of the trial court.\
  • “[Prospective jurors must be excused for cause when ... the [circuit] court determines that the juror cannot be fair and impartial.”
  • \[W]e employ a highly deferential standard of review when considering the trial [court]'s ruling on each of the grounds for a new trial.\
  • \A jury's determination of damages is entitled to 'substantial deference.'\ (quoting Todd v. Joyner, 385 S.C. 509, 517, 685 S.E.2d 613, 618 (Ct. App. 2008), aff'd, 385 S.C. 421, 685 S.E.2d 595 (2009))
  • \A contemporaneous objection is typically required to preserve issues for appellate review.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Few, Short, Lockemy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.