State v. Abuan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that specific criminal intent may be inferred \from conduct that plainly indicates such intent as a matter of logical probability\
• To show actual prejudice, the appellant must establish “from an adequate record that the trial court likely would have granted a suppression motion.”
• Criminal intent may be inferred “from conduct that plainly indicates such intent as a matter of logical probability.”
• insufficient 17 In re Pers. Restraint of Arntsen No. 101635-2 evidence of fear in fact when the defendant shot outside a house and victim was inside and could not see any shooting
• insufficient 17 In re Pers. Restraint of Arntsen No. 101635-2 evidence of fear in fact when the defendant shot outside a house and victim was inside and could not see any shooting
• \A traffic violation provides an objectively valid reason for conducting a traffic stop.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).