Skip to main content
· 1/26/1996

State v. LaMunyon

Citations

  • 259 Kan. 54
  • 911 P.2d 151
  • 1996 Kan. LEXIS 10

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that juvenile adjudications may properly be used in determining criminal history score
  • noting that the Kansas Legislature permitted consideration of juvenile adjudications in sentencing adult offenders prior to the adoption of the KSGA
  • noting that a juvenile has no constitutional right to a jury trial
  • \[A] juvenile proceeding is considered a civil proceeding of a protective nature totally divorced from any criminal implication.\
  • the possibility that the defendant's guilty plea could be used to enhance sentencing for later crimes is a collateral consequence
  • “An ex post facto violation occurs when a new law is retroactively applied to events that occurred before its enactment and the new law disadvantages the offender affected by it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.