State v. Zagorski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence that defendant, at the time of his capture, rammed a police car and opened fire on police officers inside was relevant as one of several circumstance from which a jury could infer guilt
• infliction of gratuitous violence and needless mutilation of victims who were already helpless from fatal wounds
• defendant rammed police car and opened fire on officers; his conduct at the time of capture provided relevant circumstances from which jury could infer guilt
• “flight and attempts to evade arrest are relevant as circumstances from which, when considered with other facts and circumstances in evidence, a jury can properly draw an inference of guilt”
• “A defendant’s flight and attempts to evade arrest are relevant as circumstances from which, when considered with the other facts and circumstances in evidence, a jury can properly draw an inference of guilt.”
• “A defendant’s flight and attempts to evade arrest are relevant as circumstances from which, when considered with the other facts and circumstances in evidence, a jury can properly draw an inference of guilt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).