Skip to main content
· 4/10/1991

State v. Millbrooks

Citations

  • 819 S.W.2d 441
  • 1991 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the decision to discharge a juror and to select an alternate juror is left to the discretion of the trial court
  • holding that the decision to discharge a juror and to select an alternate juror is left to the discretion of the trial court
  • holding that improper testimony did not create a manifest necessity for a mistrial because trial court gave a promp t curative ins truction
  • affirming the denial of a mistrial based upon prejudicial character evidence being countered by curative instructions
  • “Generally a mistrial will be declared in a criminal case only when there is a ‘manifest necessity’ requiring such action by the trial judge.”
  • defendant who objected to trial court’s discharge of juror failed to allege and prove resultant prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scott, Byers, Newkirk

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.