· 4/10/1991
State v. Millbrooks
Citations
- 819 S.W.2d 441
- 1991 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 281
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the decision to discharge a juror and to select an alternate juror is left to the discretion of the trial court
- holding that the decision to discharge a juror and to select an alternate juror is left to the discretion of the trial court
- holding that improper testimony did not create a manifest necessity for a mistrial because trial court gave a promp t curative ins truction
- affirming the denial of a mistrial based upon prejudicial character evidence being countered by curative instructions
- “Generally a mistrial will be declared in a criminal case only when there is a ‘manifest necessity’ requiring such action by the trial judge.”
- defendant who objected to trial court’s discharge of juror failed to allege and prove resultant prejudice
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scott, Byers, Newkirk
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.