State v. Johnson

Citations

• 217 N.E.3d 906
• 2023 Ohio 2008

Syllabus

Per Mayle, J., appellant's no-contest plea was proper because appellant did not show that the trial court's imperfect compliance with Crim.R. 11 prejudiced him. The trial court's imposition of consecutive sentences was not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. The state did not file a notice of cross appeal, so the appellate court was without authority to consider the state's argument that sought to change the trial court's order.