State v. Lucas
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5303
Syllabus
Duhart. Affirming trial court judgment because the trial court did not completely fail to comply with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(b), and because Lucas failed to show prejudice resulting from the alleged failure. Because Lucas's guilty plea was knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily made, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Lucas's motion to withdraw his guilty plea.
Judges: Duhart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-12-21· cited 173×
- State v. BarkerOhio Supreme Court· 2011-08-24· cited 131×
- State v. Brinkman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-07-21· cited 19×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-06-16· cited 15×
- State v. PhippsOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-02-01· cited 13×
- State v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-10· cited 11×
- State v. MorganOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-10· cited 7×
- State v. SheppeardOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-15· cited 7×
- State v. FriessOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-22· cited 4×
- State v. BlairOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-27· cited 3×
- State v. FontanezOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-04-25· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.