State v. Moore

Citations

• 2023 Ohio 3834

Syllabus

Per Mayle, J., appellant's consecutive sentences are not clearly and convincingly unsupported by the record. The evidence supports the trial court's findings that consecutive sentences are necessary to protect the public from future harm, not disproportionate to the harm appellant caused and danger he posed, and, based on appellant's history of criminal conduct, necessary to protect the public from future crime by appellant.