Skip to main content

State v. Black

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 5261

Syllabus

Duhart. Black's plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, as the court strictly complied with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(c) when it advised Black of his Constitutional rights and, further, when it asked him at the conclusion of the colloquy whether he had understood everything up to that point. In addition, Black's sentence to a term of imprisonment to be served at a local detention facility -- rather to a term of community control -- was not contrary to law, as it was in accordance with R.C. 2929.13(B)(1) and R.C. 2929.34(B)(3)(i) and (ii).

Judges: Duhart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.