State v. Black
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5261
Syllabus
Duhart. Black's plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary, as the court strictly complied with Crim.R. 11(C)(2)(c) when it advised Black of his Constitutional rights and, further, when it asked him at the conclusion of the colloquy whether he had understood everything up to that point. In addition, Black's sentence to a term of imprisonment to be served at a local detention facility -- rather to a term of community control -- was not contrary to law, as it was in accordance with R.C. 2929.13(B)(1) and R.C. 2929.34(B)(3)(i) and (ii).
Judges: Duhart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court· 1981-06-24· cited 893×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. Bishop (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2018-12-21· cited 173×
- State v. Heinz (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-05-05· cited 82×
- State v. Miller (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-04-14· cited 71×
- State v. Brinkman (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-07-21· cited 19×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-06-16· cited 15×
- State v. EggersOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-07-19· cited 14×
- State v. RussellOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-03-09· cited 9×
- State v. MorganOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-10· cited 7×
- State v. BensonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-12· cited 5×
- State v. ReyesOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-07· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.