State v. Johnson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing and remanding conviction because it violated the defendant’s constitutional right to be tried on the same factual theory on which the grand jury based its 342 State v. Bravo-Chavez indictment
• reversing and remanding conviction because it violated the defendant’s constitutional right to be tried on the same factual theory on which the grand jury based its 342 State v. Bravo-Chavez indictment

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Bravo-Chavez
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-09-10· cited 2×
• State v. Ainsworth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2026-03-11· cited 1×

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Davis
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2003-10-02· cited 666×
• Peeples v. Lampert
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-08-14· cited 389×
• State v. Walker
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2011-07-28· cited 171×
• McCathern v. Toyota Motor Corp.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2001-05-10· cited 74×
• State v. Long
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1994-11-25· cited 41×
• State v. Newman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-01-23· cited 13×
• State v. Haji
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2020-05-07· cited 13×
• State v. Benton
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2023-08-10· cited 12×
• State v. Samuel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-12-28· cited 11×
• State v. Bowman
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2025-01-30· cited 10×
• State v. Nunes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-12-31· cited 7×
• State v. Boitz
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-07-28· cited 6×
• State v. Roberts
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-04-30· cited 6×
• State v. Benton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2022-02-09· cited 5×
• State v. Stavenjord
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-03-07· cited 3×