State v. Nunes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that, for purposes of merger, FIP is a “continuing offense”
• describing evidence at trial reflecting that, after finding his wife’s gun, Petitioner “called [his wife] some vulgar names and fired the gun at the air mattress” and later “began stomping and kicking [his wife’s] legs”
• “ORS 161.067 * * * governs the circumstances under which multiple guilty verdicts or a defendant’s guilty or no-contest pleas to multiple criminal charges should merge into a single conviction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Barton
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-06-03· cited 12×
• State v. Ferguson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-02-03· cited 6×
• State v. Beeman
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-02-22· cited 4×
• State v. Nunes
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-11-28· cited 4×
• Garner v. Premo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-02-01· cited 4×
• State v. Johnson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-07-30· cited 4×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Fries
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2008-05-30· cited 54×
• State v. Casey
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-03-05· cited 40×
• State v. Miller
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1964-09-10· cited 18×
• State v. Evans
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-06-02· cited 16×
• State v. Davis
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-09-10· cited 14×
• State v. Gerlach
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-03-13· cited 6×
• State v. O'Dell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2014-07-16· cited 6×
• State v. Kelley
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1973-03-19· cited 5×