Skip to main content

State v. Jenkins

Citations

  • 259 N.W.2d 109
  • 80 Wis. 2d 426
  • 1977 Wisc. LEXIS 1204

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where a blood test is taken at the request of a physician \solely\ for diagnostic purposes, there is no search and seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment
  • holding that where a blood test is taken at the request of a physician \solely\ for diagnostic purposes, there is no search and seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment
  • holding no reasonable expectation of privacy in medical records because of statutory exception to physician/patient privilege in homicide trials
  • holding no reasonable expectation of privacy in medical records because of statutory exception to physician/patient privilege in homicide trials
  • doctor's testimony under subpoena about blood test results was not a search or seizure
  • doctor’s testimony under subpoena about blood test results was not a search or seizure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Day

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.