Skip to main content

State v. Davis

Citations

  • 161 N.H. 292
  • 12 A.3d 1271

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the drawing of the defendant's blood by the hospital did not implicate Part I, Article 19
  • undisputed that the hospital had withdrawn the defendant’s blood “as part of its treatment of the defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Broderick, Conboy, Dalianis, Duggan, Hicks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.