State v. Richerson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that arrest is an essential 5 introductory step before there can be a blood test under the Implied Consent Act
• stating that “a lawful arrest [is] the essential introductory step to implied consent provisions”
• holding that there was sufficient 15 evidence that the defendant committed reckless driving, not mere negligence, based 16 upon the defendant’s actions of driving 70 mph in a 25-35 mph zone in a residential 17 neighborhood, and on the wrong side of the highway
• requiring that the officer be “confronted with an emergency”
• undisputed that the defendant was not under arrest
• undisputed that the defendant was not under arrest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).