State v. Wilkerson
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1279
Syllabus
Appellant's conviction for failure to comply with an order or signal of a police officer was based on sufficient evidence and not against the manifest weight of the evidence; the evidence demonstrated that appellant was the driver of the vehicle that fled from law enforcement during an attempted traffic stop. Appellant's leaving the vehicle and hurrying into his aunt's home after fleeing from law enforcement did not constitute obstructing official business. The record does not support a conclusion that the trial court failed to consider the factors in R.C. 2129.331(C)(5)(b) at sentencing. Judgment affirmed as to the conviction for failure to comply and vacated as to the conviction for obstructing official business.
Judges: Epley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- State v. DennisOhio Supreme Court· 1997-09-24· cited 833×
- State v. EasterlingOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-06-20· cited 21×
- State v. DavisOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-30· cited 17×
- State v. BodyOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-08-24· cited 16×
- State v. PageOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-17· cited 14×
- State v. HollowayOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-11-16· cited 7×
- State v. Armstrong-CarterOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-02· cited 7×
- State v. StoneOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-19· cited 6×
- State v. JacksonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-12· cited 4×
- State v. StandiferOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-15· cited 3×
- State v. MorrowOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-08-18· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.